Categories: Data Security

Equifax Breach – Did They Fail to Comply with GLBA?

View PDF

Equifax Inc. logo. (PRNewsFoto/Equifax Inc.)

As is now widely reported, Equifax, a consumer credit reporting agency, suffered a data breach of staggering proportion. In the race to fully comprehend the ramifications of this breach, it’s worthwhile to consider what specific legal requirements Equifax must comply with when it comes to maintaining the secrecy of sensitive personal information. One law that creates such requirements is the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).

Enacted in 1999, the GLBA created two requirements for financial institutions, known as the Privacy Rule, which governs the types of notice a financial institution must give to consumers, opportunities to opt-out from the services provided, and not disclosing sensitive information to non-affiliated third parties, and the Safeguard Rule, which governs the administrative, technical, and physical security of sensitive personal information that the financial institution collects about its customers. GLBA requires that financial institutions:

  1. insure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information;
  2. protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records; and
  3. protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information which could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.

 

Given that it was a data breach that occurred, real concerns exist as to whether Equifax complied with the Safeguard Rule, specifically whether it provided sufficient technical security for the sensitive information it held. Ars Technica reported that the vulnerability that was exploited in this incident was discovered and disclosed to the public in March, 2017. However, the breach occurred in May, 2017, two months after disclosure of the vulnerability. While addressing the vulnerability was described as “labor intensive and difficult,” that does not absolve Equifax from their statutory obligation to correct a known flaw in their data security apparatus. Indeed, as it was individual’s names, Social Security numbers, addresses, and birth dates that were accessed, Equifax’s dereliction has given criminals all that is needed to cause immense financial harm to those impacted by this breach. Since the Federal Trade Commission has already announced that an investigation into the breach is underway, we can expect additional details to come to light about Equifax’s failures.

This incident underscores the importance of maintaining a high level of IT security integrity and complying with applicable laws. Consulting with an attorney to ensure such compliance can help you avoid a fate similar to Equifax.

Recent Posts

Fifth DCA Affirms Fee Award and Clarifies Rule 1.530(a): A Procedural Shift Every Litigator Should Know

Procedural rules can make or break an appeal. A recent decision from Florida’s Fifth District…

1 month ago

Pierron Featured in MLex Following Insights on USPTO’s New Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program

When the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced its new Streamlined Claim Set Pilot…

1 month ago

Florida Partition Actions: How to Force the Sale of Property

Do you jointly own property in Florida, but things aren’t going so well? Maybe it’s…

2 months ago

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Remains Open during the Government Shutdown

As of midnight on October 1, 2025, the United States government has shut down as…

2 months ago

Lady Bird Deed: A Simple Way to Avoid Probate in Florida

If you've ever heard someone mention a Lady Bird Deed and thought, “Is that a…

2 months ago

Uncontested Divorce in Florida: Breaking Up Without the Blowout

Let’s face it, no one walks down the aisle thinking, “One day, I’ll be Googling…

3 months ago