Intellectual Property Law

Federal Court Shuts Down Allergan’s Attempt to Shield Patents

View PDF

A recent Federal Circuit ruling held that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply in reviews at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board which rejected an attempt from Allergan PLC to shield patents for its dry-eye medication, Restasis, by transferring them to a Native American tribe.

According to an article by Reuters, the drug generated $1.5 billion in revenue last year for Allergan.

So, what does this mean?

In this case, one of Allergan’s patents was subject to an inter partes review (IPR). In this type of matter, a third party has requested the patent office to reopen examination based on a contention that the examiner should not have allowed the case. Generally, the third party has identified some prior art that the examiner has not considered during the examination of the case originally, and that prior art would have prevented the case from being allowed.

In this particular case, Allergan attempted to assign the patent to a Native American tribe in to use the immunity granted to Native American tribes as grounds for making the patent ineligible to be reviewed by the Patent Office during an IPR. If this were allowed to go through, then an entire industry would have popped up overnight. Patent holding companies would have been set up by Native American tribes so that companies who have patents could be shielded from possible invalidity of the patents by the IPR practice.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has rejected Allergan’s attempt use the Native American tribe’s immunity and noted that the patents for the drug Restasis are subject to the proceedings before the US Patent Office, regardless of being transferred to the St. Regis Mohawk tribe.

For our clients, it is business as usual and continues to allow clients access to the Patent Office in order to challenge the patents of their competitors (if necessary) using IPR proceedings before the US Patent Office.

If you have questions about a patent, please contact one of our IP team members today.

Published by
Mark Malek

Recent Posts

Fifth DCA Affirms Fee Award and Clarifies Rule 1.530(a): A Procedural Shift Every Litigator Should Know

Procedural rules can make or break an appeal. A recent decision from Florida’s Fifth District…

1 month ago

Pierron Featured in MLex Following Insights on USPTO’s New Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program

When the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced its new Streamlined Claim Set Pilot…

1 month ago

Florida Partition Actions: How to Force the Sale of Property

Do you jointly own property in Florida, but things aren’t going so well? Maybe it’s…

2 months ago

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Remains Open during the Government Shutdown

As of midnight on October 1, 2025, the United States government has shut down as…

2 months ago

Lady Bird Deed: A Simple Way to Avoid Probate in Florida

If you've ever heard someone mention a Lady Bird Deed and thought, “Is that a…

2 months ago

Uncontested Divorce in Florida: Breaking Up Without the Blowout

Let’s face it, no one walks down the aisle thinking, “One day, I’ll be Googling…

3 months ago