User Generated Content: Who’s Safe?

View PDF

As mentioned in an earlier post, the originators of a web presence are not guaranteed limited liability under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) merely because it is visiting third parties, and not the originators, who introduce infringing content onto an originator’s site.  Rather, the DMCA offers safe harbor only to qualifying service providers.

Safe Harbor: Eligibility

17 U.S.C.S. § 512(k)’s definition of “service provider” is meant to include services that only provide location service tools, as well as services providing Internet access and such tools.  Therefore, safe harbor only applies to qualifying online service providers (which, so far, includes single sponsor websites and joint operators of co-branded websites).

The DMCA defines the following four categories of safe harbor:

1)      Conduit per § 512(a) – the service provider plays the role of a ‘conduit’ for the communications of others (example:  AOL’s provision of Usenet newsgroups to subscribers)

2)      Caching per § 512(b) – the service provider serves as an intermediary between the originating site and the ultimate user (example: Google’s Web cache)

3)      Hosting per § 512(c) – the provider allows users to store information on its networks, including numerous activities beyond “providing server space for a user’s web site, for a chat room, or other forum” (examples:  video hosting / YouTube, Amazon zShops, user-generated real estate listings; eBay listings; Google Blogger Service)

4)      Linking per § 512(d) – the provider stores links to other websites, including support for Search Engines; any potential copyright infringement is occurring at the location to which the link or reference refers, without regard to whether infringement is technically deemed to occur at that location or at the location where the material is received.

Safe Harbor: Requirements

As stated in the DMCA, sections 512(c) and 512(d) have heightened requirements before liability protection adheres.  Those requirements vary depending on the service provider classification into which a web originator falls.  More on that next time.

Recent Posts

Fifth DCA Affirms Fee Award and Clarifies Rule 1.530(a): A Procedural Shift Every Litigator Should Know

Procedural rules can make or break an appeal. A recent decision from Florida’s Fifth District…

1 month ago

Pierron Featured in MLex Following Insights on USPTO’s New Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program

When the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced its new Streamlined Claim Set Pilot…

1 month ago

Florida Partition Actions: How to Force the Sale of Property

Do you jointly own property in Florida, but things aren’t going so well? Maybe it’s…

2 months ago

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Remains Open during the Government Shutdown

As of midnight on October 1, 2025, the United States government has shut down as…

2 months ago

Lady Bird Deed: A Simple Way to Avoid Probate in Florida

If you've ever heard someone mention a Lady Bird Deed and thought, “Is that a…

2 months ago

Uncontested Divorce in Florida: Breaking Up Without the Blowout

Let’s face it, no one walks down the aisle thinking, “One day, I’ll be Googling…

3 months ago