Categories: Copyrights

DMCA Requirements: Control and Benefit

View PDF

My last post related how Online Service Providers (OSPs) are subject to disqualification for § 512 safe harbor from copyright infringement liability based on actual or red flag knowledge of user-generated content (UGC) containing infringing material.  Another disqualifier for safe harbor is the OSP’s control of and benefit from the infringing act.

Control and Benefit

A service provider may lose protection under the § 512(c) and § 512(d) safe harbors if a court finds it both able to control the infringement and in receipt of financial benefit directly attributable to the infringement.  If a defendant OSP does not have the right and ability to control the alleged infringing activity, a court need not engage in the financial benefit analysis.

The ‘right and ability to control’ infringing activity, as the concept is used in the DMCA, means “something more” than just the ability of a service provider to remove or block access to materials posted on its website or stored in its system.  The requirement presupposes some antecedent ability to limit or filter copyrighted material.  To the extent a service provider’s activities go beyond what can fairly be characterized as meeting the collateral scope of “storage” and allied functions, and present the elements of infringement under existing principles of copyright law, those activities are not facially protected by § 512(c) and § 512(d).

Assuming an OSP is in control of its users’ content, that provider must take care that its planned business model avoids directly linking infringement to the company’s revenues to the level of direct financial benefit that would preclude DMCA safe harbor.  An accuser may claim that a company in control of its UGC is not only generally aware of, but also welcomes, copyright-infringing material being placed on its website.  Such material is attractive to users, whose increased usage enhances the host’s income from advertisements displayed on certain pages of the website, with no discrimination between infringing and non-infringing content.

(photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/matthijs/3144456275 under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0 )

Recent Posts

Fifth DCA Affirms Fee Award and Clarifies Rule 1.530(a): A Procedural Shift Every Litigator Should Know

Procedural rules can make or break an appeal. A recent decision from Florida’s Fifth District…

1 month ago

Pierron Featured in MLex Following Insights on USPTO’s New Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program

When the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced its new Streamlined Claim Set Pilot…

1 month ago

Florida Partition Actions: How to Force the Sale of Property

Do you jointly own property in Florida, but things aren’t going so well? Maybe it’s…

2 months ago

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Remains Open during the Government Shutdown

As of midnight on October 1, 2025, the United States government has shut down as…

2 months ago

Lady Bird Deed: A Simple Way to Avoid Probate in Florida

If you've ever heard someone mention a Lady Bird Deed and thought, “Is that a…

2 months ago

Uncontested Divorce in Florida: Breaking Up Without the Blowout

Let’s face it, no one walks down the aisle thinking, “One day, I’ll be Googling…

3 months ago