Categories: Copyright

Can I Maintain Authorship Please?

Recently, an individual had submitted some articles to a company for use on their website. It appeared that all was well and the articles were published. However, the individual then received an email stating that unless they were to write back to the company within 14 days denying them the use of the articles, they would take the lack of refusal, as an indication of consent to use them. What’s more, they would presume that the individual had given them the “right to use, incorporate and distribute the Content in its Services to its subscribers and to permit such subscribers to use and redistribute the Content.” Now, the last time I checked, this wasn’t the norm under the copyright law. Furthermore, it would seem that if this could legally be done, it would need to be done in some official manner, not in an email.

According to the law, there is some wiggle room in this case. “Certain acts are not to be infringement of copyright: … the reproduction in a newspaper, magazine or other periodical of an article on current economic, political, social or religious topics, unless the author of such article has expressly reserved to himself the right of such reproduction.” Copyright on the web protects the author for 70 years, at which time the work becomes public domain. Once the work is published, it is copyrighted. The owner also has exclusive rights and must give permission should anyone choose to use the information at another time. Finally, and in relation to this situation, the copyright has two main purposes; namely the protection of the author’s right to obtain commercial benefit from valuable work, and more recently the protection of the author’s general right to control how a work is used.

It’s disheartening to know that companies feel so powerful over the small business owner or individuals seeking to contribute their knowledge to a blog and/or website. They feel empowered because they’re the ones with the online business, the audience, the resource, and with that, they can call the shots and tell another person what they will and will not do, even when, as in this case, they don’t own the content.

What would make for a great turn of events would be to send the same letter back to the company stating that unless you heard back from them within 14 days, you could unequivocally utilize their content for your own business ventures. There’s no rules as to who can monopolize upon the scope of reproduction.

Published by
Widerman Malek

Recent Posts

Lawsuit over DeLorean Trademarks Heading to Trial – Back to the Future Time Machine at Issue

In the world of cinema, few vehicles are as iconic and beloved as the DeLorean…

4 days ago

The Purpose of Florida’s District Courts of Appeal

As reviewing courts, Florida’s District Courts of Appeal serve as vital pillars of Florida’s judicial…

2 weeks ago

WHEN TO CONSULT WITH A PATENT ATTORNEY: TIMING IS EVERYTHING

For small businesses seeking to differentiate themselves, patentable intellectual property can be a cornerstone for…

1 month ago

The Basics of Estate Planning

Estate planning documents are tools created to allow individuals a sense of security and protection…

2 months ago

Appellate Team Victory: Fifth District Court Upholds Summary Judgment in High-Stakes Bank Account Dispute

The appellate team of Tiffany Ann Jones, John M. Frazier, Jr., and Eric Hostetler secured…

2 months ago

Common Law Marriage in Florida: A Guide for Unmarried Couples

Common law marriages are legally recognized marriages between two partners that have been together for…

3 months ago