Larry Klayman, an attorney and General Counsel of an organization called Freedom Watch, brought an action against Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, Inc., (collectively referred to as “Zuckerberg”) asserting claims of assault and negligence. Zuckerberg filed a motion to dismiss, which the court granted just a couple weeks ago.
Klayman initiated the lawsuit after running across a page titled the “Third Palestinian Intifada” while using his Facebook account. The page called for an uprising beginning on May 15, 2011 after Muslim prayers were completed, announcing and threatening that “Judgment Day will be brought upon us only once Muslims have killed all the Jews.” The Facebook page had over 360,000 participants. The page caught the attention of the Public Diplomacy Minister of Israel, who wrote a letter to Zuckerberg requesting that he take down the page. At first, Zuckerberg refused; however, he eventually removed it.
Zuckerberg argued that the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (the “CDA”) provides that no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. The Act defines an “interactive computer service” as “any information service, system, or access software provider that provides
The court looked to a three-pronged test to determine if Zuckerberg should be liable.
(1) Was Zuckerberg a provider or user of an interactive computer service?
(2) Did Klayman seek to treat Zuckerberg as a publisher or speaker of the information provided?
(3) Was the information at issue published by another information content provider, i.e., a third party?
The court reasoned that Zuckerberg met the first prong because Facebook is a website that gives its users the ability to create, upload, and share various types of information, with potentially millions of other users. In other words, Zuckerberg provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server.
Additionally, Klayman claimed that Zuckerberg was liable as a publisher or speaker of the third party’s information, and Klayman acknowledged that another information content provider created the information. Because all three prongs were answered in the affirmative, the court dismissed the case.
Receiving a notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that you're being audited can be…
In the world of business, protecting proprietary information and retaining top talent are crucial components…
In the world of cinema, few vehicles are as iconic and beloved as the DeLorean…
As reviewing courts, Florida’s District Courts of Appeal serve as vital pillars of Florida’s judicial…
For small businesses seeking to differentiate themselves, patentable intellectual property can be a cornerstone for…
Estate planning documents are tools created to allow individuals a sense of security and protection…