Categories: Uncategorized

Inventing as an Employee – What to Know

By: Dan Pierron

Inventing is for many employees all in a day’s work, literally.  Very often, engineers, scientists, industrial designers, and many others are innovating new solutions to problems, and developing patentable inventions along the way.  While those individuals are the undisputed inventors of the invention, it is quite likely they are under a contractual obligation that does not leave them any ownership interest in their inventions.  Today, I’ll discuss likely scenarios for inventing employees, and what they can do to protect their independently-developed inventions.

Very often, as a term of employment, a company will require the employee to assign all their interests in intellectual property developed in the industry of the company, using company property, or as a part of the course of business of the company, to the company.  This is only sensible; it strikes contrary to notions of equity for a company to pay an inventor his salary, only to have to license the inventor’s patent that embodies the inventor’s work for the company.

However, being an employee of a company should not, and almost universally does not, give the company carte blanche claim to all inventive works of an employee.  Where an employee invents in an industry outside that of the company, using his own resources and tools in developing the invention, it is very difficult for the company to assert the arising intellectual property is rightly theirs.  Accordingly, it is important for an inventor to erect absolute barriers between their work as an employee and their own inventing.  Use your own facilities and equipment on your own time, so that there can be no confusion that this was your independent venture.

Often, it is not so easily determined as to whether an invention is outside the industry of the company.  An invention may have certain similarities to products offered by the company, but may yet have manifest differences.  In such situations, it is often a good idea to sit down with a representative of the company to discuss the matter.  It is likely better to sort out any question of ownership of intellectual property when as little capital, monetary or intellectual, has been expended in its development.

If you would like to learn more about patents and the patent process, please follow me on Twitter and connect with me on Facebook and LinkedIn.

Published by
Dan Pierron

Recent Posts

FTC Implements Nationwide Ban on Noncompete Agreements: Impact on Workers, Innovation, and Employers

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has made a recent announcement of a final rule banning…

44 mins ago

Navigating an IRS Audit: What Every Taxpayer Should Know

Receiving a notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that you're being audited can be…

4 days ago

Employment Agreements to Safeguard Your Business in the Absence of Non-Compete Agreements

In the world of business, protecting proprietary information and retaining top talent are crucial components…

6 days ago

Lawsuit over DeLorean Trademarks Heading to Trial – Back to the Future Time Machine at Issue

In the world of cinema, few vehicles are as iconic and beloved as the DeLorean…

2 weeks ago

The Purpose of Florida’s District Courts of Appeal

As reviewing courts, Florida’s District Courts of Appeal serve as vital pillars of Florida’s judicial…

4 weeks ago

WHEN TO CONSULT WITH A PATENT ATTORNEY: TIMING IS EVERYTHING

For small businesses seeking to differentiate themselves, patentable intellectual property can be a cornerstone for…

2 months ago