Firefighters and the Public Duty Doctrine

The story:

On January 25, 2014 Medric Mills suffered a heart attack.  He was on a public street – right across from Engine 26, a fire station in Washington, DC.  His daughter, who was with him, screamed across the street in order to get help from trained professionals.  Bystanders who stopped to help were also trying desperately to get aid for the ailing 77-year old man – some even running across the street to personally beg for help for a complete stranger.

According to published reports, at least one firefighter who was on duty across the street came out when the commotion started.  He heard the pleas for help, leaned against the station house and crossed his arms. He responded that he was not authorized to help Mr. Mills, stating that his supervisor forbid him to assist.  The bystanders, instead, were advised to call 911 and were told that the firefighters couldn’t take any action without first being officially dispatched. 

Medric Mills died that day.  The Mills family has already retained counsel and it is assumed they will be filing suit against the city.

DC Official Statement:

The mayor of Washington DC and the DC Fire Department are investigating the incident.  Neither party has disputed the facts of the story as reported.  So far, the supervisor has tendered her resignation, although it has not yet been officially accepted.  The mayor is quoted as calling the situation an “outrage”.

Public Duty Doctrine:

To the lay pubic, it would seem as if the firefighters, who are trained in treating emergency medical situations, have an ethical obligation to tend to emergencies as they see them.  However, there is a public doctrine in place that may mean the firefighters in question will not be held accountable for their choice not to respond.  It is called the Public Duty Doctrine.

The public duty doctrine states that DC employees cannot be held liable for either failing to provide help to an individual or by providing wrong assistance that causes harm to somebody.  These types of laws are usually created in order to shield emergency officials from frivolous lawsuits arising from them trying to do their job.  In this instance, it can be used as a valid defense.  Other similar lawsuits have been dismissed due to the public duty doctrine, including the wrongful death lawsuit of Moses v. District of Columbia Government.

The Mills family has given several press releases and is pressuring Washington DC to change the law.

Recent Posts

Navigating an IRS Audit: What Every Taxpayer Should Know

Receiving a notice from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that you're being audited can be…

4 days ago

Employment Agreements to Safeguard Your Business in the Absence of Non-Compete Agreements

In the world of business, protecting proprietary information and retaining top talent are crucial components…

5 days ago

Lawsuit over DeLorean Trademarks Heading to Trial – Back to the Future Time Machine at Issue

In the world of cinema, few vehicles are as iconic and beloved as the DeLorean…

2 weeks ago

The Purpose of Florida’s District Courts of Appeal

As reviewing courts, Florida’s District Courts of Appeal serve as vital pillars of Florida’s judicial…

4 weeks ago

WHEN TO CONSULT WITH A PATENT ATTORNEY: TIMING IS EVERYTHING

For small businesses seeking to differentiate themselves, patentable intellectual property can be a cornerstone for…

2 months ago

The Basics of Estate Planning

Estate planning documents are tools created to allow individuals a sense of security and protection…

2 months ago